Sharkly vs Linear

SharklyvsLinear

Linear tracks the work.Sharkly Agents ship it.

Both tools move fast. Sharkly closes the loop: import your Linear data with full history in minutes, keep the issues, Cycles, and Projects your team already knows — and let Agents pick up tickets, ship code, and bring results back for review.

At a glance

Fast tracking, finished work

Linear is a beautifully fast tracker for software teams. Sharkly keeps that speed and adds the missing half: execution.

Linear

Fast tracking for software teams

Linear is a purpose-built tracker for product and engineering teams, known for keyboard-first speed, an opinionated workflow, and a fast ship cadence.

  • Cycles, Projects, Roadmaps, and Insights
  • Keyboard-first speed and opinionated workflow
  • Triage queues and auto-assignment policies
  • Third-party AI agents through its Agent API

Sharkly

The same speed — with Agents that execute

Sharkly keeps the workflow Linear teams already know and adds the missing half: Agents that take tickets, ship code, and report back for review.

  • Issues, backlog, Sprints, Projects, and Views
  • Linear import in minutes — history included, two-way sync while you move
  • Agents as assignees — work ships from the ticket
  • Runs on the Claude, Codex, and Gemini plans you already pay for
  • Free for teams up to 10, then $7 per user / month

Side by side

The capability check

The planning layers look similar on paper. Here is where the two stand once work leaves the board.

The capability check
CapabilitySharklyLinear
Planning and tracking
Issues, backlog, and commentsIncludedIncluded
Time-boxed Sprints or CyclesIncludedIncluded
Projects that roll up progressIncludedIncluded
Saved Views with filters, grouping, and sortIncludedIncluded
Triage queue for incoming workIncludedIncluded
Agents and execution
Agents as first-class teammatesIncludedThird-party agents via API
Agents run in parallel on isolated worktreesIncludedNot included
Runs on Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and 20+ toolsIncludedNot included
Shared Agents, Crews, and Skills the team can assignIncludedNot included
Agent results wait for human review before mergeIncludedDepends on the agent
Cost and switching
Free for teams up to 10IncludedFree tier with issue limits
Predictable pricing beyond that$7 per user / monthPer-user plans that scale by tier
Model usage billingYour existing coding plans and API accountsNot applicable
Linear import with full historyIncludedNot included
Two-way sync while both tools runIncludedNot included
GitHub and Slack connectionsIncludedIncluded

The real difference

Where the tools diverge

The difference is not another column in the table — it is what happens after a ticket is planned.

01Agents as teammates

An Agent can be the assignee

In Sharkly, an Agent or Crew takes the execution slot on a real ticket — with its own context, Skills, and the coding tools your team connected. No external integration to wire up or maintain.

02Closed loop

Execution lives in the work system

Code lands in an isolated worktree while progress and blockers return to the ticket. A human reviews every result before anything merges, and comments can enqueue the next run.

03Low-friction switch

Keep the habits, move at your own pace

Import issues, statuses, and history from Linear, then run both tools in two-way sync while the team moves over one project at a time. Nothing rebuilt, nothing lost, no forced big-bang cutover.

Switching from Linear

Keep your history. Skip the rebuild.

Linear import brings your issues, statuses, and history into a Sharkly Space in minutes, and two-way sync keeps both tools in step while the team moves over. GitHub and Slack connections keep delivery and discussion where the team already lives.

JiraLinearGitHub IssuesGitLab IssuesAsanaShortcut

Start

Start with the work you already have

Create a Space, bring your backlog in, and route the first ticket to an Agent — without rebuilding the process your team already uses.

01

Bring your work in

Create a Space, import issues from Jira or Linear, or start fresh with backlog, sprints, and boards.

02

Create your first Agent

Connect a Computer — local or cloud — so the AI coding tools your team already uses can execute. Give the Agent one repeatable job, like bug fixes or test coverage.

03

Assign the first ticket

Set an Agent as assignee. Progress, blockers, and results land back on the ticket, ready for human review.

FAQ

Questions from Linear teams

Is Sharkly a Linear replacement?

+

For planning and tracking, yes: issues, backlog, Sprints, boards, Views, comments, and triage all work the way Linear teams expect, and Linear import brings the history across. The difference is what happens after planning — Sharkly can also execute the work.

What happens to our Linear history?

+

Import copies your Linear issues, statuses, and history into your Space. Two-way sync lets both tools run side by side while the team switches at its own pace.

Doesn't Linear already support agents?

+

Linear connects third-party agents through its Agent API. Sharkly builds execution into the system itself: Agents are first-class teammates that get assigned like people, run on connected Computers with the coding tools your team already uses, and report back to the ticket.

Can engineers keep their own tools?

+

Yes. Agents run on Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and 20+ other coding tools, on local or cloud Computers you connect. Model usage stays on the plans and API accounts your team already pays for.

What does it cost compared to Linear?

+

Sharkly is free for teams up to 10, and Team is $7 per user / month after that. Model usage is not marked up — it stays on your existing coding plans and API accounts.

Can we try it without a full migration?

+

That is the normal path. Create a Space, import one project from Linear, and assign the first ticket to an Agent. Keep Linear running in sync until the team is ready to move.